Market news, all day
A newsroom that tracks currencies, commodities, indices and crypto around the clock, so a move is explained while it still matters.
Who we are
traderpublic is a young independent project covering finance and investing — market news, broker research, analysis and education, with the interface published in seven languages and the articles in English and Thai.
It exists to help readers lose less money to avoidable mistakes: an unregulated broker, a fee buried in a terms page, a position sized on hope. It is also new, and parts of it were written to demonstrate an interface rather than to report anything. Those parts are labelled where they appear, and this page says which they are rather than leaving you to find out.
To make financial markets legible to ordinary people — so that a reader who arrived knowing nothing can leave understanding what is happening, what it costs, and what could go wrong.
The real ones
Six areas, one editorial standard — some running, some still ahead
A newsroom that tracks currencies, commodities, indices and crypto around the clock, so a move is explained while it still matters.
A published checklist — fees, regulation, execution, withdrawals, support — that every company will be scored against once there is a company here to score.
Technical and fundamental reviews with their assumptions stated out loud, plus price scenarios that are revisited rather than left standing.
Guides, glossaries and worked examples for readers who have never placed a trade — and for those refining a strategy.
Layouts for rates, movers and session summaries across pairs, metals, indices and digital assets. The prices in them are placeholders until a market feed is connected.
Planned, not open. When it launches it will take first-hand accounts from confirmed funded accounts, alongside our own findings rather than instead of them.
Short, recent, and told with the awkward parts left in
traderpublic began as a study of how a financial-media site is put together: the layouts, the ratings furniture, the way a broker profile is laid out. Everything in it was written to fill the shapes — companies, scores, staff and all.
The first pass had carried staff names and biographies lifted from a real publisher. They were removed and replaced with people who plainly do not exist, which is a smaller wrong but still a wrong, so they are now labelled wherever they appear.
The site was wired to an editorial system over an authenticated endpoint. Articles delivered that way — including broker reviews with their licence records attached — are the first content here that was reported rather than invented.
The broker ranking was withdrawn. The six profiles behind it are kept as illustrations, marked as invented, excluded from search and from any list that orders or recommends. Nothing is published as a rating until a licence has been checked against the regulator that issued it.
One firm, checked properly, is a better first rating than six written from nothing. The methodology below is what that check will have to satisfy.
The standard a traderpublic rating has to clear before it is published
A rating is only useful if you can see how it was built. Ours will come from a fixed scorecard applied the same way to every brokerage and exchange covered, and it is published here before the first score is, so it can be argued with while it still costs nothing to change.
No company has been through it yet. When one has, a bad score will be published with the evidence behind it, and a claim that could not be checked will be marked unchecked rather than repeated from a marketing page.
What we publish about brokers →Editor-in-Chief, traderpublic
I have spent my working life in journalism, most of it writing about money. What drew me to traderpublic was a simple editorial rule: we do not publish anything we would not be comfortable defending to a reader who acted on it.
Reporting the news is the easy half. The harder half is making the news useful — separating a headline that changes your risk from one that only feels urgent. That is the work our desks do every day, and it is why every analytical piece here passes through an editor and a fact-checker before it is published.
Markets move faster than anyone can responsibly guess at. We would rather be right an hour later than first and wrong.
— Marcus F.
Made upMarcus F. is one of this site's invented personas. The editorial rule in the letter is one traderpublic holds itself to; the person signing it is not real.
A written-up masthead, shown the way a real one would be laid out
Director of Analytics
Editor-in-Chief
Head of Fact-Checking
Senior Regional Editor
Head of Reviews & Ratings
Crypto & Blockchain Editor
Educational Content Editor
Senior Newsfeed Editor
Editorial Standards Specialist
Contributing Author
What every desk is held to
A market story loses most of its value overnight. We publish while a reader can still act on what they have learned.
Numbers come from primary sources, and where a claim has not been checked we say so instead of repeating it.
There is no advertising on this site and no commercial relationship with any brokerage. If that changes, it is disclosed here before it reaches a page.
Finance is complicated enough. We explain the mechanism instead of hiding behind the vocabulary.
The scoring model, the review policy and the parts of this site that were written rather than researched are all published and open to challenge.
We write about money people cannot afford to lose, and we treat risk warnings as part of the story, not a footnote.
Disclosure. traderpublic is a demo media project. It is not a broker, does not provide investment advice and does not accept client funds. Trading in leveraged products carries a high risk of loss; only risk capital you can afford to lose.